Gotta be Kidding

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
comments4
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
4 Comments

    • Mon Apr 14th 12:24 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Customer Omega for the Airlines
      It is quite comical to see Jarvis reply every now and then, as he considers himself the self-appointed "Most sophisticated person in the room". But he still is unable to coherently defend any of his statements. But when your career literary high water mark is TV Guide, you can get a better sense with what you are dealing.
      View article »
    • Fri Apr 11th 23:44 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Customer Omega for the Airlines
      One last thing. To the one person who still doesn't get it (yes, you Jarvis), we are not defending the industry, we merely explaining why things are as they are. If you need it, I am sure that there are some 3rd graders in the neighborhood who can explain the difference to you in non-threatening terms. You never know.
      View article »
    • Fri Apr 11th 23:34 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Customer Omega for the Airlines
      Jarvis shows his real level of maturity with his second post. Sorry, but one can only laugh at his cluelessness. I'm guessing he is enjoying the only attention he gets otherwise all day long. We are not laughing with you. We are laughing at you.
      View article »
    • Fri Apr 11th 12:21 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Customer Omega for the Airlines
      Once again, an example of pointy-headed gasbags spewing hot air rather than doing the slightest bit of research to back their claims, Jarvis rises to the top of that steaming heap today. "at least the FAA is doing its job" is his crowning statement of ignorance. As one who flys these planes for a living, I can give the facts that these are fixes that could have been done any time over the normal maintenance cycle of the airplane. They were not "Safety of flight" groundable items. But, because the FAA had it's head up its rear at Southwest, They felt compelled to exert their authority under no uncertain terms. AA's only mistake was to have a CEO with no fortitude to stand up to this measure. If the FAA had thought this was such a great threat, why did it take so long to implement this grounding? After all, this is not a new airworthiness directive. It has been around for months. Appears to be a failure of the FAA on one front or the other.

      Furthermore. Jarvis gnashes his teeth over the current state of the industry. What he fails to acknowledge is that this is the system the public has decided it wants. When the only criteria the vast majority seek when planning their air travel is price........ over time you will get the system you are willing to pay for. So it has come to pass. As for Eos, and Silverjet, who has heard of these airlines. And what about Maxjet? They all start as very noble ideas that Jarvis champions, but each, over time, fails. Hmmmm......wonder why?
      View article »