waters96

comments5
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
5 Comments

    • Mon Jun 16th 11:33 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      NYTimes Article Reverberates Through Yahoo; Who’s Their Next CEO?
      The NY Times has so much credibility these days. I remember Judith Miller pimping for Dick Cheney and that Rice woman about weapons of mass destruction. Anyway, hang in there Jerry.
      View article »
    • Sun May 4th 12:54 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      On Yahoo/ Microsoft: Jerry Yang Should Be Fired
      I love the poster who keeps spelling Jerry Yang's name wrong. Very clever.

      As an owner of the stock, of course I would like a short-term game. As an investor in a company, Yahoo did the right thing. A marriage with MSFT would've been a disaster for both companies. I believe strongly in Yahoo's long-term growth, so if I have to wait a few quarters or a few years, so be it.

      And did anyone else notice how strangely Ballmer acted throughout the entire transaction. Spoiled child? I can't quite figure out what to call it, but he certainly did not seem to act like a dispassionate businessman. He reminded me of those Viet Nam era generals who said, "we have to destroy this village to save it." Anyway, we long-term investors will have endure Bloody Monday. I'm not going to turn my computer on that morning. But I will look forward to the future.
      View article »
    • Sun Apr 27th 14:38 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Yahoo's Online Services Continue to Deteriorate
      This is really a ridiculous bandwagon, pile-on of Yahoo. Totally mislabeled. I love all the services I use at Yahoo. It has been and will continue to be my homepage, e-mail address, etc.
      View article »
    • Tue Apr 15th 16:12 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      RBC Analysts: Stay Long Yahoo As Its Possibilities Grow
      Silicon Olie, no, MSFT is not bidding against itself. YHOO was not selling. MSFT approached them and offered 31. YHOO evaluated the offer, and countered with 40. So, if MSFT wants to buy YHOO in a friendly way, it must split the difference. If not, the only way to "buy" an unwilling owner is to do so in a hostile way. I don't understand why you don't understand that very simple concept.
      View article »
    • Thu Mar 20th 13:58 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Citigroup Analyst: Microsoft Still Committed to Yahoo
      If MSFT really wants YHOO then they should pay up and get off the lowball offer - splitting the difference between 31 and 40 gets the deal done - the rest is BS
      View article »