fauxscot

comments9
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
9 Comments

    • Fri Aug 29th 09:49 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Why Apple Stock Is Poised To Go Flat - At Best
      Mr. Verke,

      I won't resort to calling names, but boy, I must admit to agreeing with the prior posters... you seem to have drawn tenuous conclusions from your dubious premises.

      Market cap? Sure, I'll buy the disconnect between Apple and some other folks. This outfit is generating some serious cash, though. Billions and billions of it. The company projects this to continue, and regardless of its current overall market share, and/or the state of the PC market at home, there is abundant room for growth in sales from just capturing additional market share. The products are highly desirable. They are day and night better than PC/Microsoft combos, and the company has figured out how to service its customers so well it occupies the TOP SLOT in customer satisfaction.

      Have you used one of these things? Good god, man! Eveything they touch gets better. Hell, the even reinvented the concept of backup, with their simple, obvious, and bulletproof Time Capsule/Time Machine combo. They finally fixed one of the biggest headaches in all ConsumerCOmputerLand..... the need for reliable and simple and transparent and fast and useable (and wireless!) backup of data and program. Cheap. With decent margins. Equivalent windows hardware has to be cobbled together with the disparate products of companies that don't talk to each other.

      The examples of greatness in this outfit are legion. I think you'd be well served to consider how much of a game changer they are, then revisit your arguments.


      View article »
    • Thu Jul 3rd 07:18 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Apple, On Huge Order, Breaks NAND Flash Supply
      Wow. This post repeats itself in several places.
      Wow. This post repeats itself in several places.
      Wow. This post repeats itself in several places.
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 2nd 08:54 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Microsoft's Six Year Wagon Rut
      My only experience with Vista was installing software on a new Dell laptop for someone. I found it sluggish, but pretty. I would not have been pleased with it if I had to use it because of the slow responses.

      However, I'm not a luddite, and can certainly afford any hardware I want. That said, why in the world would I change to Vista? I am simply not compelled to do so. I don't NEED any more features at this point, and prudent caretaking of my XP SP2 machine gives me a perfectly suitable computing experience without security issues, preserves my investment in existing software, requires no learning curve, requires NO hardware upgrades, and I am hard pressed to explain why I would want to move to Vista?

      Marketing is about motivation. Microsoft can force-feed Vista via new hardware sales, but for the hundreds of millions of people out there like me, they have to provide a reason to change. What is that reason? Eye candy?

      I don't hate Microsoft. I personally feel that Gates deserves to be a billionaire. (I was there before the PC and DOS, in the era of CP/M and a zillion, highly technical, obtuse, and unreliable OS's, and with all its problems, Windows has revolutionized computing for the common man.) I also like Apple, and ran the equivalent of Windows 98 on a Lisa in 1986. Microsoft's "innovations"... have their origins elsewhere!

      Apple's story with OSX is so much more compelling than Microsoft's with Vista. There IS a reason to change. There IS a compelling value added. There IS the ability to try something new and at the same time, preserve XP/PC software on a new, elegant, fast machine.

      Vista might not be a "mistake", but it certainly seems to be the victim of a confluence of negative factors in the market, the economy, and the competition. Microsoft has a lot of bright people, and they'll adjust. THey have money and inertia, as well as market share. Something good will eventually come out of Redmond, but the current spectrum of Vista products isn't compelling enough to push me to place an order.
      View article »
    • Fri Jun 6th 08:46 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Apple: No 3G iPhone at the WWDC?
      Jesus Christ, will, ...grammar! "You're" not "your". Telling someone that they are an idiot by using 3rd grade grammar is bad enough, but the fellow's point is useful. We're all hoping for a specific outcome, and those of us who are long on Apple are completely different than those who are not in it for the long haul. Volatility is the one thing you can really count on with Apple, and one false move from our friend, Steve, can mean 30 points down. If you're betting the rent on Monday, you'd better have a plan B.

      View article »
    • Fri Apr 25th 07:45 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Apple’s Dramatic Risks and Ambitions
      " The iPod Touch which is an iPhone without the mobile capabilities helped in the 8% y-o-y iPod revenue growth."

      iPod Touch does actually have mobile capabilities. It's got WiFi and works just like an iPhone without the PHONE capabilities. Hackers have actually made it work with Skype.

      Mine gives me portable email, stock checks, a browser, weather, calendar, contacts, notes, youtube, maps and 16 GB for (in my case) 4500 portable photographs and several thousand tunes. For $400. And it fits in my pocket.

      I think those folks that think of the touch as a bloated iPod are missing the boat. You need to see one.

      It isn't a Shuffle. It's different, to coin a term. On the basis of it alone, I think one could build a sizeable company.
      View article »
    • Sun Mar 30th 08:11 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Unfairly Punished Apple Still Fresh
      You know, webster, the article was about business, not tech. Your comments were about tech, not business. Can you see the difference?

      Can you dispute a single thing in this article? Can you do it without name calling?

      Why so much energy devoted to the effort to pound down this article's contentions that all relate to business issues?

      FWIW, I am a PC users whose spouse owns/uses Macs. I am in a damned good position to see who spends more time frustrated with the computer, and it's not she. Still, fundamentally, none of that has anything to do with this article, which just deals with stock valutation, growth potential, historical performance, etc.

      The vigor, irrelevance, and name calling in your post presents a poor public image and if there is any worthwhile content in the post, not many people are going to consider it credible. It appears YOU have some sort of agenda, as opposed to the article's author.

      You may want to consider that when you spend that much time assembling a post.
      View article »
    • Fri Mar 14th 07:02 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      AppleTV Has a Lot of Catching Up to Do
      Gaming? Are you serious?

      Does Tommy have a little pituitary problem that prevents him from attaining adulthood?

      Gaming?

      Honestly, as someone who doesn't watch TVs, DVDs, or shoot aliens, this quibbling about gadget feature sets for the quasi-sentient among us escapes me. I'll just go by the 'units shipped' number and see what happens to my Apple stock, thanks.
      View article »
    • Mon Mar 3rd 08:12 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Apple Buybacks: Still a Bad Idea
      @have a life....

      And why should Steve Jobs listen to you? Because he's not doing what you wish he would? Perhaps you have some experience turning a huge, failing, innovative company around? If that's the case, just buy a controlling interest in Apple common stock, push for a board seat, and force the "idiot" to do your will?

      As for me, I'd like all sorts of great things, like world peace, but when it comes to stocks, I'm an AAPL owner for the same reason I own other stocks... long term capital appreciation. That goal is served best by sound business strategies and execution, areas where I would say Jobs has demonstrated some skill.

      If we're coming up on economic nastiness, I'd sure like to know my investment in Apple isn't going to turn into something akin to Qualcomm, Global Crossing, JDSU.

      Given time, the cash will get applied to a good use, I hope. If it's a buyback, great. If it's a non-recurring dividend, great. If it's a promising acquisition, even better. So far, Mr. Jobs seems to be doing a credible job, and if you think that the question of 'What are we going to do with all this cash' hasn't come up in conversations in Cupertino... well, you are just silly.

      Rock on, Apple. I, at least, am patient.
      View article »
    • Mon Jan 21st 17:33 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      4 Problems With the iPod Touch
      Actually, I bought one about two weeks ago. I have been looking at iPods for years, and this was the one that pushed me over the edge. I took a few thousand songs and five thousand photographs on the road with me and without exception, everyone I have shown it to wants one. I upgraded the firmware and apps ($20) and it's now location aware. It has an email client, weather and stocks, which is all I ever use.

      Since I didn't have another iPod concept to compare it against, it seems pretty damned nice to me, and I think it has enough cool factor to make it a huge success. Prying $400 out of me hasn't happened in the other 5 generations of this thing. Seems like it motivated at least one human, who suspects others are pulling out credit cards, too.

      Sure, I'd like more storage, and that will no doubt come soon. Meantime, it is a great device and while I won't run with it on my next marathon, it sure will be a staple of my daily dress.

      If this is an Apple failure, I can't wait to see the next one.

      Oh, and this blog post sucks banannas, Fred. Dork.
      View article »