Which Banks Are Left to Help with Sirius's Financing Needs?
In a shocking surprise that could only be compared to the Miami Dolphins pummeling of the New England Patriots over the weekend, Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) are abandoning their investment banking models.
My initial reaction prior to having my first cup of coffee was indifference. The opposite of love by the way, is indifference, not hate. That’s how much I don’t like Goldman Sachs. The fact that I was formerly employed at Morgan Stanley made little difference to me.
Having enjoyed my first cup of coffee and wiped the sleep from my eyes, the wheels in my head are beginning to spin and the first question I pose to myself is whether this means Goldman will be forced to cover their short positions in Sirius XM (SIRI). Will Goldman,s hedge fund clients such as the now infamous “Jonesie” of SiriusBuzz radio fame now cover their short positions also as a result of being left out to dry?
Near as I can tell, the answer is going to be a resounding “yes!.” Details are sketchy as the announcement is only hours old, yet the visibility and transparency required on bank holding companies will give little wiggle room for any manipulative practices.
One benefit of an investment banking business is its research capabilities, which will be dramatically affected at GS and MS going forward. Clients could be leaving in droves which could affect Sirius XM shares.
As for the financing needs of Sirius XM, I would remind others that Sirius XM seemingly had no intention of ever using the services of Goldman Sachs. It is more likely that the company would turn to UBS (UBS), Bank of America (BAC), or Merrill Lynch (MER), all of which have been extremely bullish on SIRI. Even Barclays (BCS) is about to own the investment banking division of Lehman (LEH).
The net effect is that while Goldman henchmen Mark Wienkes and Jim Cramer were busy trying to bash Sirius into non-existence, Goldman instead fell victim to its own practices. Imagine that! Mark Wienkes a bank teller! I can’t wait to see that!
Today is a good day to be a Sirius fan, and a Dolphin fan for that matter!
Disclosure: Long Sirius. No positions in any of the banks mentioned.
Related Articles
|



This article has 157 comments:
- Wanker-Banker
- 3 Comments
Sep 22 09:08 AM- User 267071
- 2 Comments
Sep 22 09:19 AM- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 22 09:27 AM- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 22 09:29 AM- SIRI, go up!
- 77 Comments
Sep 22 09:30 AM- WeThePeople
- 14 Comments
Sep 22 09:50 AM- Well This Might Be SIRIUS?
- 413 Comments
Sep 22 10:02 AM- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 22 10:33 AM- altri
- 8 Comments
Sep 22 10:49 AM- Siriphone
- 48 Comments
Sep 22 11:58 AM- Well This Might Be SIRIUS?
- 413 Comments
Sep 22 12:00 PM- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 22 04:13 PM- hairpie
- 52 Comments
Sep 22 04:19 PM- rational one
- 4 Comments
Sep 22 04:22 PM- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 22 04:24 PM- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 22 04:25 PM- sl62
- 605 Comments
Sep 22 07:00 PMwww.fool.com/investing...
As I said a few days ago, the official bottom for this stock happend last week (Monday)--the lowest price for many years to come @ .68. No way it goes any lower. I would tell anyone considering trying to day trade this stock right now to not do it. The refi is at hand and you will never know what premarket or afterhours this stock will take off in. As we saw last week, when it hit 1.08/1.09 bid/ask premarket, that is when it will run like the devil amidst panic covering, euphoria and greed. Don't make the mistake of not being in EVERY NIGHT--or you will be locked out. The financing is the only thing holding this stock back from the first big run back towards normal levels. If they have the deal close at hand, they might be waiting to time in with the official RTC deal announcement this week. Congress leaves in Oct. so the RTC deal will be signed and sealed by end of week. Don't be shut out!!
- cos1000
- 1080 Comments
Sep 22 07:12 PM- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Sep 22 10:54 PM- I'm not Jim Cramer
- 131 Comments
Sep 23 12:01 AMWhen the bailout came out several days ago, somebody (was it you relmor or sl62?) said the government would MAKE money because they would hold and then sell in a better market. At the time, I said that no way would the government have the freedom to turn out those who default on their mortgages, unlike private business, so it would be a money losing enterprise. From today's AP wire:
"Frank said he and Paulson had agreed to create a congressional oversight board as part of the bailout and to mandate that the government come up with a plan to avoid foreclosures on any mortgages it acquires in the rescue. A government official with knowledge of the talks confirmed the administration backs those provisions."
That's why it's foolish to think that we can call a bottom. Today's bailout could be totally ineffective, or exacerbate the problem by causing hyper inflation.
- I'm not Jim Cramer
- 131 Comments
Sep 23 12:33 AMFrom the Washington Post:
"The higher the prices the government pays for troubled mortgage securities held by banks, the more the rescue will bolster those banks and sustain the lending that is vital to the broader economy. But higher prices would also mean a worse deal for taxpayers.
In other words, the more effective the plan, the more expensive it will ultimately be. "
- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 23 02:04 AMWhy does .68cents have to be the bottom? It doesnt have to be, I suppose. Its just a call. It looks like the bottom. Thats all. Action would indicate it would be. 9 million share action at the end might signify that. Plus its retrace hit a nice resistance at .90 cents today. If market stays relatively neutral of slightly bearish, Sirius should retrace to 1.00 now. If not, might bottom around .80 cents and then go up. But the new test down wont come close to .68cents. I do predict further down, I sold some shares today to rebuy lower. Lets see if im right.
- sl62
- 605 Comments
Sep 23 01:53 PMI did say that at one point there was a projection of a potential 30B upside when/as the market recovered and things were getting for the most part addressed (years from now)--which would essentially work out as a taxpayer savings, not a pure profit for the gov proper--and which was reported rather than my opinion. I, along with everyone, Paulson, et al, has no idea what is there or not. Also, that report (as reported on CNBC) was when the request/estimate was for 500B. Now it's 700B so probably a moot point, if it was even valid at all. As said, no one really knows what's going on (other than the individual institutions who know their books). That will be the discovery.
Personally, I'm ready to rant. Watching this testimony today, it's maddening. First, one senator brought up, why not just do this in pieces. I agree. Paulson doesn't need 700B tomorrow. Legislate an agreement to allow gov action now and create broad strokes or stages, all contingent upon review to move up into a next stage. Start out with authority to 100-200B now to steady the markets and let Paulson get started and work through October. When Congress gets back in Nov, Paulson gives a report and assesment of what he's starting to find--pure transparency with no tricks. All of this dicking around when NOTHING is exactly knowable yet is a waste--of my time, yours and theirs--everyones. You don't have to be hit in the head with a brick to understand something needs to start along the Paulson plan, and it needs to start NOW. Waiting even another day is stupid and a waste of time. What needs to happen immediately is to start the investigation and just get going. This whole process is/will be totally mutable so don't be so hung up on a random number right now.
Second. I'm sick of hearing from every senator that it's only about evil Wall Street. If anyone can be honest, the taxpayer is just as responsible for this mess as the institutions. They signed on the dotted line in euphoria, taking on too much house, participating in a loan without any down payment, no docs or proof of income knowing full well they would not be able to afford the payments long-term (unless their property values kept going up), doing one refi after another and taking cash out (funny money). I mean if someone advertised to you a way for you to jump off a cliff and kill yourself, isn't it up to you to decide if that would be good for you? Isn't your participation your call? I don't recall these institutions walking around with AK's forcng people into these deals. Or are people so hypnotized in this country that they'll just do anything that someone advertises--and probably because their buddy or neighbor just did it? Don't answer that question because the answer is sadly yes. Yep, both sdes of this equation are at fault and if it now costs the taxpayer some cash to dig out of it, so be it--they're at fault too. Where is their responsibility? So far all I hear is they are victims. I don't agree. Congress is today showing what makes them such ineffectual leaders. Fillibuster for the sake of stroking their power egos, waste time, get nothing done, waste taxpayer money with stupid, unnecessary programs for their own states, then go on vacation for a month. Pathetic. If nothing else, Congress should recognize their own failures by not ensuring the proper oversight of Fannie, Freddie et al, and just get Paulson on the case asap. Had they done their job in the first place, we wouldn't be in this mess.
- relmor
- 601 Comments
Sep 23 02:02 PM1.1999 Clinton repealed the act that capped investment bank margin abilities.
2. Greenspan kept the interest rates too long, for too long.
3. Mortgage oversight went out the window, and brokers got paid MORE MONEY to write BAD loans. Subprime mortgages got the broker more money. There you go, see , it is the industries fault, and who cares what the people signed, they were hosed, had, and screwed over. As a lender, if you write a loan you know probably wont get paid back, then you sell it, thats fraud. And then you take this fraud and you borrow money against the fraud. 100 percent the governments fault and the mortgage and banking industries fault
0 percent taxpayer(unless you just assume voting democrat or republican(no difference) is their fault, then I will agree. Anyoen who votes democrat or republican in this election is a fool, and doesnt deserve the right to vote. You will get more of the same. They screw up, we pay for it. Period. Governement wanted to consolidate banking, gain more power to the FED and tank the dollar.
Mission accomplished. Good job Bush, your agenda was perfectly executed. You will go down as the most efficient productive president in history. Look at all you have accomplished for the one world government.
- sl62
- 605 Comments
Sep 23 02:49 PMI'm all over that. What a disaster the GWB Admin has created in 8 short years. He will be leaving office with us "at war" which I say loosely because it's more like a huge street fight (not to disparage those boys/women fighting and dying in it--props to them for sure), our entire financial system in a freefall and near a complete meltdown, high unemployment and a completely stalled economy, still reeling from failed FEMA mgmt and N.O. still a war zone, and the list goes on. Great cred! Even he's got to know he's turning over the keys of a beater...nice job G! All in the name of the nwo apparently....
I agree with your layout on the institutional side but I don't see how you exonerate joe blow. Yes, it was fraud what was done on the other side and proper investigation can expose it and who, but c'mon, how is the person who signed the paper for the obligation not at any fault whatsoever? It's like letting an investor in the market of the hook for buying stock when they probably don't even know what their risks were. There has to be some responsibility there I say. I'm not letting the perps on the other side off the hook..let's get some jail time going..all for it. but the guy who signed on the line is not scott free either.
And it was Chuck Shumer who said do the plan in stages. In an interview on CNBC a little bit ago, Shumer said Paulson is estimating needing 30B a month to attack this. Well there it is, give him 90B now and let him get started, He's out of here in Jan '09 anyway. Let the one taking over for him keep the train moving and request more money as needed. There, problem solved and this sharade can move forward. What these dudes don't seem to get is the money helps open liquidity and lending asap--which is desperately needed. The paper's already bad--it's a foregone conclusion.
- RReagan
- 46 Comments
Sep 23 03:10 PMNow whats up with SIRI, or should I ask whats down with it?
- ma33
- 19 Comments
Sep 23 03:39 PM- 163888
- 960 Comments
Sep 23 03:43 PM- 163888
- 960 Comments
Sep 23 03:53 PM- GotSIRI
- 58 Comments
Sep 23 04:17 PMIf you believe W did anything to make you safer, you are blind. If any thing, the actions of this administration has created more enemies. And as far as adverting the financial crisis, that ship sailed months ago. This was so easy to see it was sickening. I watched as all this construction boomed and wondered who was buying all this stuff. I agree the person who signed the paper is equally responsible and should be held accountible.
If we arent in a world of hurt now, then what are we in? Turned a surplus into a trillion dollar deficit, 4000 dead Americans, corporate fraud, economy is in ruins, unemployment at stagering numbers. Yeah, W is a god.
- Well This Might Be SIRIUS?
- 413 Comments
Sep 23 04:31 PM- GotSIRI
- 58 Comments
Sep 23 05:07 PM- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Sep 23 05:38 PM- learn to think
- 43 Comments
Sep 23 06:43 PM- Bababooie
- 135 Comments
My Website
Sep 23 07:18 PMSounds like you read, and understand "The Unseen Hand".
cuddos!!
- Well This Might Be SIRIUS?
- 413 Comments
Sep 23 07:27 PM- 163888
- 960 Comments
Sep 23 07:50 PM- learn to think
- 43 Comments
Sep 23 07:56 PM- sl62
- 605 Comments
Sep 23 08:05 PMSIRI up in AA .88/.89-- last trade .89
SIRI's stellar bottoming performance last week really impressed a lot of people. Suddenly many more articles are bullish. The Fool's on board and now evil TheStreet.com...by ex pro football and baseball players...go SIRI.
www.thestreet.com/_aol...