In some of my earlier posts (e.g., "Another Industry that Is Not Recession-Proof" and "Recession-Proof?"), I pooh-poohed the popular notion that certain sectors will somehow be unaffected by the powerful recessionary winds sweeping across America.
Record high debt levels, ultra-low personal savings rates, and a U.S. - and world - economy that has been overly dependent on a free-spending American consumer virtually ensure that the fallout from economic contraction will be widely felt.
Even the consumer staples sector, which has been seen as something of a safe haven, is unlikely to come through the troubles ahead unscathed as competition increases and spending habits change.
It seems to me, for instance, that personal and household product companies have in recent years focused their attentions on "aspirational" shoppers, many of whom have tended to spend more than they could afford. In future, consumers like that will be few and far between.
Many major-brand makers also seem to have lost touch with how pricey their goods have become as a result of the numerous price increases that they were able to push through during better times.
Indeed, I've often wondered whether people will keep paying twice as much for Proctor & Gamble's (PG) Tide detergent, for instance, as for other brands. Based on my own experience doing laundry (I'm no slouch, by the way), rival - and cheaper - products seem to do as good a job cleaning clothes as P&G's iconic offering.
Well, it looks like growing numbers of Americans, either out of choice or necessity, are starting to reevaluate their habits as far as spending on "necessities" is concerned. In a post at MSN Money's Top Stocks blog, "Pinching Pennies: Consumers Switch Brands," Anthony Mirhaydari details what could be a potentially far-reaching shift in behavior.
Related Articles
|
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 5 comments:
- rm
- 89 Comments
My Website
Aug 08 12:12 PMThat said, it remains to be seen if they'll make permanent changes in their buying habits.
- rm
- 89 Comments
My Website
Aug 08 12:24 PMIt appears to me that the predominant thinking for the last decade or more has been to find ways to raise prices without adding value... "sunsetting" software that worked perfectly well, etc.
A return to old-fashioned principles would be welcome change. I think companies are going to have to do more than smoke, mirrors and BS to charge premium prices.
[rival - and cheaper - products seem to do as good a job cleaning clothes as P&G's iconic offering.]
You mean that bright, vibrant orange bottle doesn't get clothes cleaner?
- iThinkBig
- 863 Comments
My Website
Aug 08 06:09 PM- tedstr
- 22 Comments
Aug 09 10:08 AMThis has been fueled by the late 20th century convergence of mass manufactuing (superpowered by CAD/CAM efficiencies), mass media (superpowered by TV ), and mass marketing to the mass affluent. Even lower socio-economic groups participate now through mass retailing (Walmart and the arrival of big box retailing).
I doubt most of the people reading this have seen life today at a Walmart in Flint Michigan. Lots of America at the start of the new century not looking very nice.
- henarl
- 170 Comments
Aug 10 03:31 PM