You have to read between the lines to see it, but it seems even more clear now than it ever has. Sirius (SIRI) and XM (XMSR) are not going to give up spectrum to facilitate the merger. Mel Karmazin and David Frear both stated in strong terms that they are not going to do anything that is not in the best interest of shareholders and subscribers, and that they would walk away from the deal if it came to that. Giving back spectrum would harm both shareholders as well as existing subscribers.

Consider that Sirius and XM have promised that existing radios would work, and that existing subscribers would still have access to the quantity and quality of programming that exists today. If Primospere were to get 30% of the spectrum, how could Sirius and XM keep their promise? The same is the case for the Georgetown Partners proposal seeking 20%. In either situation, both subscribers and shareholders absorb the pain.

Simply stated, the Primosphere plan is a deal breaker. So is the Georgetown Partners plan or any plan seeking a swath of the current spectrum. They are all deal breakers.

Sirius and XM have committed to 4 channels each (a total of 8 channels). Perhaps that will become 10 channels total, but they are not giving up spectrum to accomplish this. Public Knowledge has sought several conditions in the merger process, and much of what they are seeking can be accomplished if the merger is allowed to proceed without further cannibalization. However, if Primosphere or Georgetown were to get their way, none of this can be accomplished. Georgetown recently committed to Public Knowledge and Media Access Project that they would facilitate the goals of each IF Georgetown got their 20% AND these groups got what they were seeking. This will never happen, and hopefully Public Knowledge and Media Access Project are aware of this. The Georgetown proposal is a deal breaker.

The FCC now needs to consider whether they want something or nothing. If the FCC wants A-La-Carte, Interoperable Radios, some Public Interest A programming, and Open Access, it will only happen with a merger. If the FCC steps into the realm of stripping away spectrum, they will squash the deal and then none of the consumer benefits will come to fruition.

Simply stated, the merger and all of the benefits will not happen if spectrum loss is part of the equation. The FCC, Public Knowledge, and others need to weigh the benefits that can be brought vs. the thought of having the merger fall apart, and a status quo situation (Sirius and XM with exclusive OEM deals, exclusive content, no interoperability, and no A-La-Carte) for current subscribers as well as future subscribers. There are 17 million existing subscribers that have a certain level of service right now. To disrupt that service or take away from it is something that the FCC should weigh carefully. Many existing subscribers are the very people that have committed to and are fans of satellite radio. To take away from these subscribers would be a disservice to them.

Georgetown’s Proposal - Deal Breaker
Primosphere Proposal - Deal Breaker
Public Knowledge Proposal - Workable
Media Access Proposal - Workable

At this point the cards are on the table. If this was not clear to people earlier it should be now.

Position - Long Sirius - Long XM

Tyler Savery

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 91 comments:

  • May 16 08:46 AM
    Tyler.... I agree completely. Mel's solid comment wrapping up the earnings conference call and David Frear reiterating the same language at the Morgan Stanley communications conference the next day shows the company's stance. "They clearly have laid all their cards on the table" and giving up spectrum, 20-30% to a competitive company, leased or otherwise, would clearly do the new company harm.
  • May 16 08:54 AM
    Forgive me people but What is spectrum?
  • May 16 09:09 AM
    Ace22...The license from the FCC gives SATRAD a band of frequencies to operate their programming in. Simply stated, satellite equipment breaks the frequency band (bandwidth) into channels for programming. Spectrum is a portion of the bandwidth. So you can see giving up bandwidth is the same as giving up channels of programming. 20-30% is a significant competitor to the existing business.
  • May 16 09:55 AM
    It is nice to see Mel and Frear finally take a stand. The MRQ numbers definitely were stronger at Sirius then they were at XM. The government will have to bail out XM in a few quarters anyways. They my as well let Sirius have those subs now. I wonder if XM had a rotten quarter on purpose?
  • May 16 10:05 AM
    FCC approve without any conditions. To hell with your jobs in this election year, do what is right.
  • May 16 10:09 AM
    I dont understand how the fcc is getting away with this!!!
    Who has attority over them and how come there not doing anything? There clearly purposely causeing the downfall of these 2 companies for there own benifit. There all a bunch of usless scum who needs the fcc anyway what happend to freedom of speech!!!
  • May 16 10:31 AM
    One question I have is if Sirius and XM are allowed to merge, it would seem the FCC could make available another license for a third party to broadcast satellite radio, if someone did choose to. Where would the bandwidth spectrum come for that new license?

  • May 16 10:56 AM
    Less of a problem with 2 mojor oil companies,and look at the price of gas now.I'm sure glad the gov. is looking out for me.
  • May 16 11:08 AM
    Egg, well if I am correct there is still 25% of the original spectrum that was offered to SIRI/XMSR still left.
  • May 16 11:13 AM
    this whole process has been rediculous- if the FCC kills the merger, one company won,t exist within 2 years. The end result is one company left standing with all of the content that anyone wants. Let it happen now, or it happens anyway later.
  • May 16 11:16 AM
    They'll stand by the deal as long as the FCC allows them to freeze out competition. Sweet.
  • May 16 11:28 AM
    russo3113, Do you know how the real world works? There will always be two, unless a merger happens. If one or both do go into bankruptcy then it will come back stronger then before with less dept. Now if you are a share holder then you may want to worry about this, because you might be left holding the bag. I love to use K Mart as a example because I think they filed for chapter 11 twice, and 13 once, and look they are still around right. The airlines are another great example of this.
  • May 16 11:30 AM
    Egg, 163888....I don't believe a third party coming in would bother Mel at all. What the problem is, is that the opposition at the FCC wants access to Sirius/XM spectrum that exists within their satellite's working bandwidth/spectrum, access to their auto maker deals, and access to their installed radios chip sets without paying for any of the capitalization and ten years of development in the market place. A third party competitor taking bandwidth from their existing license without these conditions would not be a threat.
  • May 16 11:35 AM
    FCC ......SHAME on YOU!!!
    This is nothing but a shakedown to which you have become a party to.
    People have made a choice by PAYING for subscriptions.
    No one has twisted their arms.
    If they are unhappy they will no longer subscribe.
  • May 16 11:41 AM
    What I do think subcribers will be pissed with, if a merger does not happen is the 1 or 2 dollar increase per month they will be paying. The only reason SIRI/XMSR has held off this long is because of the merger. I actually love this as a share holder. The two will be able to blame the FCC for the increase and be able to push all the negativity towards congress. Instead of people telling SIRI/XMSR how outragous this is they will be writing congress. I have to tell you Mel makes me laugh. I can see it now, Him saying in a press release " I am so sorry about the increase but because the merger did not go through instead of a decrease, we have now got to raise our fee."
  • May 16 11:42 AM
    The FCC delay is indeed disappointing. Perhaps if the penalty for blowing the merger would be an eternal drive through Nebraska with only terrestrial radio as a companion?
  • May 16 11:44 AM
    cos1000, where did I say that Mel would care. I was answering russo3113. I already know that he would not care when he and XMSR already have a lock on OEMs.
  • May 16 11:47 AM
    cos1000, sorry it was in answer to egg not russo3113
  • May 16 11:51 AM
    Tyler:

    So will they vote on what's proposed? Can they vote on the options.

    Is it true that all that is needed is a 3 to 2 majority?

    Is there a basis for the FCC to mandate loss of spectrum?

    What would be the reasons sited to back up such a proposition.

    Do XM and Sirius have an arena to defend a position that the FCC is stepping out of bounds from serving the mandate relative to this merger.

    I can't believe, if the FCC rules on issues that are not really in their sphere, or if they rule in a way that is "justifiably"... unreasonable, that Sirius and XM would not have recourse.

    Otherwise the FCC would be acting in an Omnipotent fashion and where would the checks and balances be relative to this agency.

    It can't be like the supreme court can it?

    There has to be an appeal process relative to this agency,
    but I guess that might have to work both ways if it was true.

    Not for nothing, but it seems to me if they meet the workable options, that they may suceed with a 3 to 2 vote.
    What is your read of the 5 members?
  • May 16 12:15 PM
    If the FCC continues to delay their decision in response to terrestrial radio influence, or if they become to over zealous in making additonal requirements that threaten the fianancial viability of satellite radio, then Sirius could simply decline, let XM go bankrupt over the next year due in strong part to the duplication of overhead costs and simply pick up the pieces with no commitment to the FCC whatever. Ironically prices would escalate significantly from that point thus enhancing profitablity and there would be no complex transition to deal with.
  • May 16 12:29 PM
    163888....I know you know Mel wouldn't care so long as he doesn't have to give anything up. I also agree with you that Mel would be so very humble in his price increase announcement, as he privately is laughing all the way to the bank, blaming the FCC. I also think he would appeal any denial of this Merger, using all means available to him. This would also keep out any new competition as XM files bankruptcy also blaming the FCC. I also agree that without a merger , XM, at the cost of shareholders and their creditors, would come out of bankruptcy as a stronger company.

    By the way..I bought some DSX this morning...better late than never. I also picked up some more NM.

  • May 16 12:32 PM
    100 million dollar contract for scumbag Stern. I hope both companies perish. Top of the order for what's wrong with America.
  • May 16 12:42 PM
    Look at how XMSR came about years ago after buying out the original purchaser (SKYC) of FCC spectrum rights for a pittance (I wonder about the back room deals). Those "SKYC" stock owners were left with a bankrupt company to see XMSR arise like magic like a Pheonix. Is history trying to repeat itself ?????????
  • May 16 12:52 PM
    cos1000, I will not promise it will get this high, but here is some data, the last time the dry bulk index was this high, DSX was at 45, Nm was at 18, and DRYS was at 145. That was at the top of the hill just before the seasonal downturn.
  • May 16 01:02 PM
    163888...Yeah, your reminder yesterday gave me the kick in the pants to look at the charts again and I think your right on. Although given the climate and demand this year I think it might go higher. Everyone has been watching and waiting, including myself. With all the interest new money is bound to enter this sector. Thanks again for the advice.
  • May 16 01:20 PM
    It is truly amazing to me that our govt. doesn't even feel the need to hide their obvious personal gain. It's one thing to steal in a sneaky kind of way, but quite another to stick it in our rectum in Macy's window. Cramer calls them out. Others call them out. And they are so brazen, they don't care. I hope this all blows up in the FCCs face. I wish that the Georgetowns of the world would also get exposed for the self serving scum they are. Mel is a very smart guy. Hopefully he can get some justice for this corruption we call govt. F THE FCC! F SHARPTON! F JACKSON! F THE BOUGHT POLLITICIANS!
  • May 16 01:26 PM
    On a seperate note... Great job George W. and Dicky C. Why don't you guys go hunting... Ok, I'm done.
  • May 16 01:26 PM
    I think that the FCC will have to back down and take all the good benefits the merger will offer. Otherwise, a lot of nagative stuff will happen, as pointed out above and the FCC will get the heat. Wouldn't look good for the current administration either in an election year. This controversy will probably drive down the stock price so some of the smarter, better heeled investors can accumulate even more shares.
  • May 16 01:35 PM
    cos1000, No problem, think of DSX this way even if it gos down, who cares with the dividend that it pays you really cant lose. plus if it gets to 40 or 50 by Jul, or Aug. sell then wait til Jan. or Feb. to buy it back at 20 or 30 somthing. Thats what I would do.
  • May 16 01:38 PM
    I put my wife kids and house on this merger. If this deal doesn't go thru. I am going to have to move back in with my parents. FCC if you dont approve this, you are going to be sleeping with the fishes.
  • May 16 01:57 PM
    thanksgovt. F*** YEA!!
    your the f***ing man
  • May 16 01:59 PM
    hey cos1000, nobody thought the index would get as high as it was back in Oct., Nov. again. Think about the margin it only cost them about 7,000 a day to run a capesize ship and they are getting 78,000 to 190,000 a day.
  • May 16 02:53 PM
    To FCC;
    You all should be embarrassed, and fired! You have lied and stalled enough. 180 day clock =a scam, by the end of the year=a Lie, by the end of the first quarter=another Lie. DOJ has proven this is not a monopoly! Allow the licenses to be combined and stop pandering to every group out there! They have no right trying to get my Company for free, I paid for shares of my company and you have no right to give anybody anything that I own. If the minorities want more radio exposure let them go buy a radio station with their own money. This is a free country, not a socialist state. So allow the combo with no concessions other than what the companies agreed to begin with. I hope you are all investigated for this disgrace, you are going far beyond what the FCC was intended for and now you are using this unassigned power to destroy American confidence in our government, and any company you choose to destroy. Your stalling of this decision has cost me personally and many more I am sure, I hope the companies file suit for your stall tactics, the empire state building was built in less time. And both companies have now lost the Millions/ Billions due to your indecision. You have no right to cost companies so much. This is America, free market capitalism, remember? This is not a necessity it is a pay luxury service. Mr. Martin do you have a Boss that oversees you, or are you a free-bird with no one to answer to? I would like to speak to your boss because no common sense decision can take over a year to make. I don’t know of any company, employee, or anybody that can take so long to do a job and still have a job after showing this amount of incompetence. I want you and you group all fired. Here is a link to a video that shows how irrelevant you group is; www.youtube.com/watch?...
    So in ending you appear to be protecting your buddies at the NAB, and pandering to any special interest group wanting something for free. How about the Americans you supposed to be protecting? By the length of time you have been taking means one thing to this American and that is you are saying FU to ME. And I want you Fired. I will be sending this to anyone that will read it, the sad thing about that is that unless it is accompanied with a check, I assume no government official will read it.

    Signed; One disappointed American.
  • May 16 03:09 PM
    Could the FCC's actions be considered reckless? There is billions of dollars in play on this deal. Might be far fetched, but is it possible to take legal action against the FCC?
  • May 16 03:21 PM
    Shouldn't there have been a press release stating that neither company has opted out of the rolling two week merger extension? I thought part of the idea with the rolling two week extensions was to keep this in the public eye. I believe the first two week period ended yesterday.
  • May 16 03:31 PM
    David Frear, CFO of Sirius, said it best when asked about the last 15 months of FCC negotiations at the Morgan Stanley communications conference. He called it a "Tortured Path". In reading everyone's frustration that may be the understatement of the year.

    As an investor I am relieved to think that the line is being drawn at the FCC negotiating table by my company. As a subscriber and consumer of satellite radio, 2 after market radios at home and in my car, 1 manufacturer installed in my 2007 Outlander, I am pissed at the thought of the FCC doing anything but approving this merger without any harmful concessions, especially after the DOJ decision.

    Refusing this merger will snuff out innovative products that we may have enjoyed as paying customers from the new company. Once again the Democrats have sided with mediocrity rather than excellence.
  • May 16 03:51 PM
    Siri and XM paid for the spectrum, I would assume they know what they need now and how they plan to use it in the future, if they are saying they can't make this work with less.... I understand. If they are saying they can make it work with less but want FMV for it, I understand. That said, I have to trust them to negotiate this point so that my stock in both doesn't take any more hits.
  • May 16 04:08 PM
    cos1000, I agree, What do you think about this; The FCC cant try and give spectrum away. Their only reason to do it would because they felt it was a monopoly that would hurt consumers, hence the giving of spectrum to stop the monopoly aspect. The problem they face is the regulator that is suppose to be the expert in this, the DOJ said it was not a monopoly. It is not the FCC job to figure out if it is a monopoly or not. They are there for one main purpose to protect the costumer. They cant say we want to take spectrum away, and give it away to another, under the perception that it would serve the consumer more to stop a monopoly then for the consumer to have less content or less quality sound. The DOJ messed the FCC up. The 2 democrats on the board now are saying we have to look at this more because the DOJ did not do a good enough of a job by letting this merger through. When Adelstein said that, it showed him to be unrealistic. Why, well first of all it is not his job to decide if this is a monopoly or not, that is the DOJs job.
  • May 16 04:16 PM
    mgv11...I'm confused by what you think is going on at the FCC. First of all if FMV is "Fair Market Value" there isn't any of the parties who want to pay anything for the spectrum that is being negotiated away by the FCC. They: Georgetown Partners, Public Knowledge, and the Media Access Project, want it for FREE! Wake UP!
  • May 16 04:48 PM
    163888...I absolutely agree with you that the DOJ has undone the FCC's ability to give spectrum away when it requires the existing license holders to also give away their technology advantage. Giving up spectrum without giving access to their technology to their future competition is something that you and I have already agreed would not hurt the merged company. It could easily be argued that it is within the FCC's authority to do this by maintaining availability of spectrum for future use in the public interest.

    As you have said before, and I agree, the 3 FCC republican members are willing to protect consumer interests by leasing spectrum, say 8-10 channels of bandwidth to "public interest, ie, minority progaming, with access to existing company technology. They, Martin in particular, has also said it would be in the public interest, for ala-carte programming, remove explicit programming if you choose to and not have to pay more for it: The companies have agreed and presented a plan. Price per subscription was another issue that was removed by the ala-carte plan. All of the other requests being made of the companies is someone trying to get something for nothing, and that is clearly not within the authority of the FCC.

    For the 2 Democrats to change their job description because they don't like the DOJ decision, I feel, like you, that this will put their objections, ney votes, at risk down the road. They are looking as foolish as the 11 States Attorney Generals who also didn't like the DOJ decision.
  • May 16 05:51 PM
    As each day passes the FCC embarrasses themselves a little bit more. Make a decision already. The FCC is not an independent U.S. government agency as their website states. If they were, they would've made a decision by now.

    If you are upset about how long this merger has taken do something about it. This is the link to Kevin Martin's email...
    KJMWEB@fcc.gov

    This is the phone number to the FCC...
    1-888-225-5322

    Make a difference. Make your voice heard.
  • May 16 06:39 PM
    The comments made by the last half dozen or so of you could not be more dead on. Dissed American...PERFECT. I WILL be writing AND calling as soon as I am done here. Although as I have stated, it seems as though they have zero fear. I think minorities should start going shopping, and demanding 10-20% of what they want for free. After all...they're minorities for goodness sake. And when minorities become the majority, will they get special treatment because they're the majority? It's so so sad.
  • May 16 06:57 PM
    I'm soo glad to see that someone here has a brain to see through all the "BS".
    Thank You - Disappointed AmericanMay 16 02:53 PM
    For the comment and the link.
    And for - pmelloMay 16 05:51 PM
    For the information given for all to email or call to make a difference.

    I don't believe that these notions to place additional demands on Sirius/XM are needed. This moronic way of thinking that all things should be given for free to those of color because of there historical past slavery past is "BS".
    No further restrictions should be put in place for this merger to be approved.
    I hope that if this approval is not met by the FCC that further steps are taken to sued and that it is heard by a higher court to over turn the FCC's decision [if it come down to this]. And that those within the FCC not only loose there jobs but that also the FCC is in some way placed in jeopardy of having a government investigation.
    It's amazing to me that this has taken this long for this merger to be approved when all outside fears from the NAB and others just are not justifiable.
    It a luxury item that is not going to cause anyone heart failure.
  • May 16 10:25 PM
    I couldn't agree more! The FCC is a joke, and if the republicans (BUSH) don't get involved quickly and clean this mess up - quickly, they will have a big problem on their hands - very soon.

    That's you McCain! Get ready to defend the FCC's inabilities. I am sure the Dems have already added Kevin to the long list of inept appointed officials. Way to go, Bush.

    I hope that this article and the comments will get more press, because more people need to see this for what it is - robbery and sabotage.
  • May 17 01:49 AM
    Folks, forget about calling or writing to the FCC; they have received hundreds of e-mails, phone calls, letters. They have been lambasted and criticized on national tv and on the internet by influential people. And they have not reacted because THEY DON'T GIVE A RAT'S ASS! Now, do you really think they will react to anymore of our complaints. Complaints from us, who they view as a bunch of pissants? It's time to find other methods. We should start bombarding the DOJ. We should start bombarding McCain's office. Seventeen million subscribers= 17 million votes. Not to mention the stockholders who will vote for him. We should start bombarding democratic senators and representatives and point out that they are losing many votes over this. Names should be mentioned. We need to remotivate Cramer. And all of this should be done PUBLICLY.

    On another note, why can't the FCC simply give out another license? After all, whoever gets this license will be so far behind XM/SIRI that it won't matter much. They would have no satellites (huge capital expenditures there), and they will have no OEM penetration due to deal exclusivity between the car companies and XM/SIRI.
  • May 17 02:16 AM
    You see Cos1000, and killerkaul, why I have to keep stating politics, You get people saying what the last few have.

    I will say it again THE 3 REPUBLICANS ARE FOR THIS MERGER, THE 2 DEMOCRATS ARE AGAINST IT. Instead of writing Kevin Martin and telling him something he already knows. Try writing the 2 democrats and tell them enough, with the meetings that have gone over and over the same thing. Enough with the investigations as to what the DOJ did, by approving this with no conditions. TELL ADELSTEIN IT IS NOT HIS JOB TO FIND OUT IF THIS IS A MONOPOLY OR NOT. Tell him he may disagree with the DOJ, but it is the DOJs job to find if a company is a monopoly or not, NOT HIS. Tell the 2 democrats to stop trying to get conditions that are to much for SIRI/XMSR to accept.

    When you write Martin you waste your time and his. Why, well I will put it as simple as possible, so all the dumb asses get it. If somebody wrote you to say you need eyes to see, are they telling you something you dont already know. Martin knows this has gone on for far to long, He has been for it, for at least 6 months (remember when he said he sees a decision on this by the end of the year and also by the end of the first quarter) from that you can only conclude at this point, that he at least was ready himself, to vote to approve this. SO GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES AND WRITE THE PEOPLE THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HOLDING THIS VOTE UP. Qiut writing Martin and telling him shit he already knows
  • May 17 02:24 AM
    gekko13, you get it. The only problem with Mc Cain doing any thing this time, was the fact the last time he said to I think the DOJ or FTC, just make a decision ether way, just make one, he was critisized by the democrats because he had gotten contributions from the company that was waiting. As he said I did not tell them to approve it. I just said it has been far to long and they needed to make a decision ether way.
  • May 17 10:57 AM
    Jesse Jackson and his boyfriend can kiss my ass, I am a shareholder and I say NO. They are race baiters and hate them for it. Primosphere is out of it altogether, they were outbid in the first place, again NO. I could live with Gigi Sohn's proposal it is fair. Media Access, I am not sure. I need more info.
  • May 17 12:17 PM
    The minority card that keeps cropping up when issues such as this merger rears it's ugly head is totally sickening...just look the state of affairs in our current governmental/societal situation. We have continually given and given our hearts and souls to the minority factors in our society for past injustices inflicted by our forefather's actions...at what expense has the majority relinquished our rights...we keep giving, and giving, and giving; all the while the minorities in our country keep wanting more, and more, and more.
    It seems to me we keep selling ourselves out. The FCC can drag their feet all they want, but I would think after so many months of raking in the money from all the terrestrial interest groups these pompous asses would take the money and run...approve the merger as is and stick it to all the interest groups and lobbyists that
    donated our hard earned dollars...after all isn't this what our politicians do best? Come on, we all know what's going on here. When are we going to wake up...after all who was it that said..."a government of the people by the people for the people"...
  • May 17 12:48 PM
    In a "Liar, Liar" world, the FCC might release a statement that says,

    "We here at the FCC are only interested in legislation to the highest bidder. Furthermore, we hate Howard Stern and loathe Bubba the Love Sponge, and since Clear Channel and CBS were so kind as to line our pockets even further than the ridiculous "fines" we imposed on them for the aforementioned entertainers, we are trying to appease these two companies in the hopes of doing more lucrative business with them in the future. We are, after all, an independent government agency, not elected, but appointed by, and solely answerable to the President of the United States, who is far too busy these days to pay any attention to what we may be up to.

    "Therefore, we are doing everything in our immense power to destroy this deal so that Clear Channel and CBS can seek their revenge on Mel Karmazin, Howard Stern, and Bubba the Love Sponge by bankrupting Sirius and XM so that Clear Channel and CBS can buy them up for pennies on the dollar. Rest assured that when those purchases come up for our review, they will be approved immediately."

    I wish someone in the media would stop belly-aching and come right out and openly call for an independent investigation into the obvious back-room closed-door deals going on here.

    This is nothing short of criminal!
  • May 17 04:42 PM
    cos100: the FMV is exactly my point, it is simply ludicrous to expect either company to give up something they payed dearly for, for nothing, therefore if to consumate the deal they (siri and xm) decide they could part with spectrum, fine. But I do expect them to get FMV for it. There is no free ride here and I am amazed at anyone who thinks they should get anything for free. Its easy to ask, ridiculous to think you're entitled to it.
  • May 17 05:48 PM
    mgv11, what planet do you live on? Of course they're entitled to it! They are minorities! Their great great great great grandparents were oppressed! If it were not for "the majorities great great great great grandparents, the minorities could be living the good life in Chad or Sudan. They could be enjoying a friendly fight over a bag of rice while flies lick the moisture out of their childrens eyes. Give them EVERYTHING! God knows they deserve it. Almost as much as our wonderful politicians do.
  • May 17 09:34 PM
    163888, I get your point but I think it would still be a waste of time writing and calling the two Dems for the same reason that it would be useless to call Martin. They KNOW what's up from our end but they're only interested in their end. We need some movers and shakers to call them out publicly. I figured McCain could take a stance if the GOP is truly in favor. I'm sure he has to have some pull with that idiot president we have, after all he is the next in line.

    On another note...what would happen if XM/SIRI were to simply ignore the FCC and go ahead with the merger, using the DOJ as a crutch. Can they pull it off?
  • May 17 11:24 PM
    Yes, they would lease the spectrum and get some payment for it. I think when people say it would be given to them, they mean that for all that the leaseing parties get, it would basically be nothing. For instance 100 million a year is what I would consider, it being given away, when considering the cost to date to get where SIRI/XMSR are today.


    gekko13, I would agree that would be the case, But it is even less important to write to somebody to tell them something they already know then to write to somebody that is against what you want. To be honest I do think it will not change anybodys mind ether way the republicans on the board have their ideology, and the democrats on the board have their ideology. The differense here is most agree and that includes democrat shareholder and subscirbers, with the republicans on the board. Where I get so pissed off is the democrat shareholders and subscribers, still try and blame the republicans on the FCC board for this debacle. Put the blame where the blame lies with the democrats on the FCC board. I can tell you this much it is not the republicans saying we should give 20% of the spectrum to George Town Partners.

    You want to know the differense between republicans and democrats? Both see 2 men, one has 2 cows and the other has none. The democrat says well we cant have this we need to take 1 cow, from the guy that has 2 and give it to the guy that has none. The republican sees the same thing and says *so*. The point is democrats think government should force charity, republicans think charity should be voluntary.
  • May 18 08:15 AM
    looks like karmazin's lawyers just aint got the juice to get the deal done.

    if it doesn't happen how will sirius find the capital needed to put new birds in the sky to replace the ones they got now with decaying orbits?

    i liked to commercial i saw on battlestar galactica friday evening '17 million listeners', not yet.

    i'm so glad i bought in @6 and got out of XM @29.

    the only good thing XM has now is O&A.

    FRUNNNNKKUUUUUUSSSSSSS...
  • May 18 12:17 PM
    mgv11:....any negotiation with the companies for FMV of Spectrum dearly paid for over the years with investor money needs to take place in a business meeting BETWEEN THE INTERESTED PARTIES, in a boardroom, because SIRIUS/XM and the parties think its good business for the companies to do....NOT IN ANN FCC MERGER LICENSE REVIEW MEETING. THE FCC HAS NO AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE THE BUSINESS INTERESTS OF SIRIUS/XM. THE MINORITY PARTIES AREN'T NEGOTIATING WITH SIRIUS/XM FOR SPECTRUM, THEIR STEALING IT WITH THE BLESSING OF THE FCC. AGAIN I SAY. WAKE UP!!!!
  • May 18 12:28 PM
    Sirius Fan....very clever... an sadly probably true.
  • May 18 08:24 PM
    MIKEEEEE, Sirius current satellites still have a life span that takes them into 2015. So I dought vary highly that if financing was a problem they would not be launching two newer ones until much later (instead of the 2009, and 2010 launches). As for the 17 million listeners, SIRI has explained this before, they consider every subcribtion to have two listeners. My question to you is how could anybody with such little knowledge in a sector invest in it, unbelievable.
  • May 18 11:04 PM
    Kevin Martin could bring this to a head and end it by taking a voting poll of the Sirius and XM subscribers, the ones who would supposedly be hurt by the merger. I think we all know how that would turn out. Then let the vote stand.

    Also, X/S should stipulate that after the merger it has the right to cancel and replace any station that has less than 3% subscription by a la carte subscribers.
  • May 19 12:24 AM
    RE: MIKEEE, I just read, reread, and reread again your last comments. What are you smokin? I got nothing at all out of whatever you were trying to say.
  • May 19 05:14 AM
    mgv11, What cos1000 is saying if the FCC makes giving up spectrum a condition then all the bargining power SIRI/XMSR had would go right out the window.

    For instance SIRI says we will lease it for 100 million a year. GTP comes back and says that is to much we wont pay it, we cant make a profit if we pay that much, we will give you 50 million. If SIRI says no, then GTP can go to the FCC and say SIRI is not holding up their end of the deal. They want more then we can possible pay and stay in bussiness. Even though FMV is 100 million because of what SIRI/XMSR has put into it, GTP can say well you cant ask us to lose money on this deal. Now normally GTP would just walk away and move on, but because the FCC has told SIRI they have to do this, SIRI we be forced to take alot less then what the spectrum is worth. At the same time GTP gets a bussiness on a silver platter.
  • May 19 07:09 AM
    Re: 163888, I think your concerns are unfounded. Georgetown seems to be a reasonable group. What reasonable group could possibly believe they should be given something for nothing? Speaking about reasonable... I think that GTP should have 20% say so in all FCC decisions about everything from here on. Actually every buisness country wide should just send them year end checks for 20% because... well...they're minorities.
  • May 19 07:31 AM
    thanksgovt., I think you are forgetting about the Latinos. I mean, you have not heard the NHMC (National Hispanic Media Coalition) is now requesting the FCC give 15% to them also. I had thought when I first read this on Sirius Buzz, that Tyler Savery was playing a joke on us, I was wrong, he wasn't. Whats next the Germans going to take a piece too, hell why not the Irish also. There should be some way to get 300% out of 100% right.

  • May 19 08:42 AM
    163888, can I call you 888? 888 you are off base with your German Irish thing. While they are technically minorities, they are NOT minorities! See? Since they have worked for everything they have, since coming over on boats with nothing, and even though they were treated like shit for generations, they did not demand things for nothing. Because they have not been given anything for nothing, they have NO RIGHT to ask for anything else for nothing. SEE? I believe restaurants should start setting aside 6 days a week (20%) to give minorities free food. Well, not exactly free. A price that they feel they should pay. Whatever that number is. Because they are minorities. As far as my close minded little pea brain sees it, the only minorities that should be getting ANYTHING for "nothing" at this point, are Native Americans. Period.
  • May 19 09:19 AM
    thanksgovt., of course 888 is fine. I agree with the Native Americans portion to a point. Lets not forget though, that every race has been screwed over by every othe race over time. Hey buy the way when are we going to get our reporations from blacks? I am part Italian and the Moores were blacks. I believe their ancestors raped and killed and enslaved my ancestors when they invaded Rome
  • May 19 10:15 AM
    RE: thanksgovt and 163888, You guys must be raving racists to be pointing out the obvious on the pc. minority " entitlement ." How dare you! 163888, the germans and irish are not allowed to play the pc. minority game........ they are not white, {oh my gosh , I meant "caucasion"}... I'm so sorry, I'm so sorry, please forgive me. I must learn to choose my words more carefully, so as not to inflame the "PC" croud. I want to puke.
  • May 19 10:24 AM
    Killerkaul, you know me I could give a crap what people think about the truth. By the way I am not Italian, I said it to make a point. because us polish have never been mistreated by blacks just everybody else.
  • May 19 10:39 AM
    I have to say, this along with my 41 sell order on DSX going through has me laughing. the only thing that would make this day better is if dsx gos to 45 today or the FCC makes a F-ing decision. Unfortunately neather of those will happen today.
  • May 19 11:08 AM
    re; 163888, I 'm not holding any dsx, still hanging on to my drys, do you or Cos1000 have any fslr or wgov? Opinions?
  • May 19 11:43 AM
    killerkaul....I don't have any FSLR, instead I got in on LDK at about 33.50 but just got sold out of it today at $41. I have a speculative solar play with NCEL Energy that I got into at $1.90. It just announced that it was going to the Caribean and Latin America with Ridge Partners to develop 600MW. It's has been on a tear for the last week. Today its at $4.60. I have no idea where it's going but am enjoying the ride so far. And on 163888's recommendation I'm in DSX, and NM until at least August, without any bad news.
  • May 19 11:53 AM
    I looked at wgov, don't know much about it, seems to have come a long way fairly quickly, but so isn't every other stock associated with alternative fuels or energy efficiency. Woodward appears to be in a good sweet spot, but I don't know anything about their management.
  • May 19 12:00 PM
    COS1000, Anything green has been doing so well, bought BWEN,at 12.32, unfortunately only 200s-don't know how much longer the virticle line will cont. before a pullback. Keep seeing the ethonol stock rise and fall in my mind. Thanks.
  • May 19 12:35 PM
    Killerkaul.... correction NCEN is my wind energy, LDK was solar....I get so confused some times...sorry man
  • May 19 01:02 PM
    killer and cos, are these stocks good? By good, I mean have they done the right thing and given GTP a "fair" portion of their company for being minorities. Or are they just greedy devils that want what they have worked for, for themselves and their investors? Just curious.
  • May 19 01:08 PM
    On a different note. I watched my Cavs get beat by the "Irish" I mean Celtics on Sunday. Why is that WHOLE team "Irish"? Sorta seems wrong to me. Maybe I'm just bitter from the loss.
  • May 19 01:32 PM
    killerkaul....I'm just curious. Did you stay away from Sirius before the call? That pullback after the call, that's happening now, is what 163888 and I were talking about. As the daily volume drops with "no news" so does the stock price. Keep some powder dry.....
  • May 19 02:27 PM
    O.K. I am back, holy crap I leave for a few hours and most of the the market I am in gos to pot.
  • May 19 02:52 PM
    Why is XM suddenly tanking? Did I miss some news?
  • May 19 02:56 PM
    killerkaul, No I dont have those, and I just told pain on the 16th on the article before this one (the one that says FCC determined to establish their auth.) I sold the 400 shares of DRYS I had at 111.
  • May 19 03:25 PM
    I think any of these green stocks are scary the shoes are droping on this crap about people causing global warming. Before you know it they may tank. Did anyone hear about the next ten years now are supposed to be getting colder, not warmer. This is the kind of news I am talking about. Most may not remember this but the same people that are saying there is global warming, were saying 20 years ago there was going to be a ice age coming. When the news comes, that all this hype is wrong watch all those solar stocks slide like a avalanche, most may not know this but solar panels today only have about 30% productivity and need to be at least 70% to be viable replacement.
  • May 19 03:37 PM
    Sirius Fan, the news was there was no news. Thats enough to bring SIRI down at this point.
  • May 19 03:57 PM
    Cos1000, I started buying siri on Cramer's recommendation two months before the DOT blessing. In combination with info from Tyler's,163888's,NotVe... and your comments on the blogs. I traded it back and forth from 3.50 to 3.75 , and finaly held at 3.50, buying down all the way to 2.38, thinking the FCC might pass the merger at any moment. I'm still waiting. I may start to trade back and forth again, if they don't stop draggin their asses. I'm sure getting tired of having all this money tied up, and having to pass up so many other good sectors. Oh well. What do you do?
  • May 19 03:58 PM
    163888...who said you could leave anyway? you didn't leave anyone at the controls and all my stocks went to sh-t too, nice job. just kidding.

    Sirius Fan, look at my post above on SIRI to killerkaul at 5/19, 1:32 PM. "No news" is all it takes for both of these stocks to float down, although todays volume was pretty normal, watch out if the volume drops off, they'll trade lower still.

    163888...Science aside, oil prices at these levels is more of a trigger than the science... All the talk about approaching "Grid Parity" with coal and gas and new money anticipated from the inevitable Democratic President with a democratic congress is a pretty good stimulus for these stocks and their "GREEN" too. The new democratic congress is going to remove oil subsidies and feed these fledgling green companies whether they pan out or not. There won' be a President elected who would dare to veto that bill. Even McCain, especially if we have $4/gal going into Winter. If oil prices tank so won't these companies, but that's about all that going to stop them in the short term, (now 'til the end of the year)
  • May 19 04:37 PM
    cos1000, Well said, and I can agree totally with it. I myself will stay out for personal reasons. If you read the last comments to pain on the last article, You will see I got out of DRYS even though I would have stayed in until at least a few months after the split that is coming soon for personal reasons. I should have held off on my convections for another few trading hours though.
  • May 19 04:40 PM
    There is local number for the Washington D.C. Metro area 202-418-0437 for the FCC

    I was unsuccessful with the toll free number.

    Certainly as I have posted before on Tyler's site-----spectrum that Siri and XM own should not be given away to Georgetown Partners or to any other entity that want's a piece of the business they did not build.

    It is a shame, a real shame, that a few Congressmen and a few Attorney Generals aligned with the Democrat Party made an attempt to block this merger approved by the DOJ by lobbying the two Democrat members of the FCC------a real shame that we are being denied this world-class
    system.

    I was so very proud that Sirius-Satellite broadcast the Nascar, the NFL, the Pope's visit, the Frank Sinatra Special and so much more.


  • May 19 04:57 PM
    Killerkaul, nice playing the channel, I would have waited til it got a little higher, but then again I am a greedy bastard. I hate to say this but when I saw the earnings for the quarter I was really disappointed. So I sold the 2000 extra shares at 2.85. Now for the I hate to say part: I would like it if no news comes out until it hits 2.5 so I can get those extra shares back.

    Also my convictions will only go so far, so if DRYS gets down to 98 I will buy back 200 shares. I hold that veiw until July then I would wait til Jan. or 60 something to buy back.
  • May 19 05:01 PM
    Roxieanne, I cant agree more, here here, well said.
  • May 19 06:40 PM